JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)December 5, 2001

A- de 2001

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa

✓Claimant Oscar Hernando Gil Isaza

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto Negativo De Competencia
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Conflicto De Competencia Entre Tribunales Administrativos
  • Sala Plena de lo Contencioso Administrativo del Consejo de Estado
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se declaró que la Sala Plena de lo Contencioso Administrativo del Consejo de Estado es competente para decidir sobre el conflicto de competencia surgido entre la Sala Primera de Decisión del Tribunal Administrativo de Antioquia y la Sección Segunda, Subsección C, del Tribunal Administrativo de Cundinamarca, toda vez que es el superior jerárquico común.

En consecuencia, se ordenó enviar el expediente a la citada Sala para lo de su competencia.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. Declarar que la Sala Plena de lo Contencioso Administrativo del Consejo de Estado es competente para decidir sobre el conflicto de competencia, surgido entre la Sala Primera de Decision del Tribunal Administrativo de Antioquia y la Seccion Segunda, Subseccion C, del Tribunal Administrativo de Cundinamarca.
  2. Segundo. Ordenar que por Secretaria General, se envie el expediente a la Sala Plena de lo Contencioso Administrativo del Consejo de Estado, para lo de su competencia.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.